Thursday, October 4, 2012

Should we use E.A. Wallis Budge hieroglyphic transliterations?


Don’t let people tell you that Wallis Budge transliterations are inaccurate.  There’s more to the story…
Excerpted from Wikipedia:
“…Budge was also a prolific author, and he is especially remembered today for his works on ancient Egyptian religion and his hieroglyphic primers. Budge’s works on Egyptian religion were unique in that he maintained that the religion of Osiris had emerged from an indigenous African people: “There is no doubt”, he said of Egyptian religions in Osiris and the Egyptian Resurrection (1911), “that the beliefs examined herein are of indigenous origin, Nilotic or Sundani in the broadest signification of the word, and I have endeavoured to explain those which cannot be elucidated in any other way, by the evidence which is afforded by the Religions of the modern peoples who live on the great rivers of East, West, and Central Africa … Now, if we examine the Religions of modern African peoples, we find that the beliefs underlying them are almost identical with those Ancient Egyptian ones described above. As they are not derived from the Egyptians, it follows that they are the natural product of the religious mind of the natives of certain parts of Africa, which is the same in all periods.”
Budge’s contention that the religion of the Egyptians was essentially identical to the religions of the people of northeastern and central Africa was regarded by his colleagues as impossible, since all but a few followed Flinders Petrie in his contention that the culture of Ancient Egypt was derived from an invading Caucasian “Dynastic Race” which had conquered Egypt in late prehistory and introduced the Pharaonic culture.”
“…Though his books remain widely available, translation accuracy has improved in detail, along with significant revisions in dating, since Budge’s day. The common writing style of his era—a lack of clear distinction between opinion and incontrovertible fact—is no longer fashionable in scholarly works.”

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Using satellite geography to redates the Egyptian timeline of the Giza Plateau.




Using satellite geography we can now accurately re-date the construction of the Giza Plateau; erected during the 4th dynasty of the Old Kingdom to occurring approximately 37,000 years ago. This is done by measuring the time it took for the Nile River to migrate away from the causeways of the Giza Plateau (Reference: The Pyramid Code documentary created by Carmen Boulter). A far cry from the 2613 BC. year date given to us by 19th century Egyptologists who penned their errant works by candlelight.  This also answers the puzzling question of how were the large cut stones were moved from the quarry to the construction site? Simply on a barge along the Nile of which at the time was at the base of the causeways of which are now miles away.

This revelation should draw into question others ancient dates as well ex: The Nubian Mirs which are taught today to be “younger” than the ancient beginnings of the Egyptian civilization even though ancient Nubia is closer to #LakeVictoria of which is the beginning point of the Nile river of which was/is the life blood for these civilizations.


Revered Egyptologist Wallis Budge wrote:
“There is no doubt”, he said of Egyptian religions in Osiris and the Egyptian Resurrection (1911), “that the beliefs examined herein are of indigenous originNilotic or Sundani in the broadest signification of the word, and I have endeavoured to explain those which cannot be elucidated in any other way, by the evidence which is afforded by the Religions of the modern peoples who live on the great rivers of East, West, and Central Africa … Now, if we examine the Religions of modern African peoples, we find that the beliefs underlying them are almost identical with those Ancient Egyptian ones described above. As they are not derived from the Egyptians, it follows that they are the natural product of the religious mind of the natives of certain parts of Africa, which is the same in all periods.”  
Whereas his colleague Flinders Petrie wrote that the culture of Ancient Egypt was derived from an invading Caucasian “Dynastic Race” which had conquered Egypt in late prehistory and introduced the Pharaonic culture.

It was Petrie's thesis that was concerted, thus they had to ignore the obvious and rewrite time-lines to suit their innate, egotistical fantasy of "European" Egyptian glory.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Nebuwah

Nebuwah נְבוּאָה

prophesying





Saturday, October 15, 2011

The dark skin Messiah

Above is a photo of a Young man who is a Hebrew from Ethiopia.


Ok,

The world debates the question: "What race was the Messiah Jesus?"  But the answer is clearly laid out in your New Testament.

Let's check it out.. 
1. Act 13:1
¶ Now there were in the church that was at Antioch certain prophets and teachers; as Barnabas, and Simeon that was called Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen, which had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul.

2. Niger of course in Latin defines the word black.
"The etymology of the word 'niger' is from the Latin word for 'black'. In botanical nomenclature, where the species name is niger, this indicates that some aspect of the organism is black."

3. Simeon was the brother of Jesus
Matthew 13:55: "Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?"
Mark 6:3: "Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him."

4. So, if Simon (Simeon) was called Niger meaning black and is the brother of Jesus then guess what?  Jesus is black too!

Here's a modern day photo of what Jesus who's true name is Y'shua Ben Yosef probably looked like.

Above is a photo of a Young man who is a Hebrew from Ethiopia.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Genesis 1:2


Gen 1:2 "And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters."

So, according to the bible the earth was created before the Sun?






Here are the Actual Facts:
Age of the Earth: 4.54 billion years
Age of the Sun: 4.57 billion years

The Sun is 3 MILLION YEARS older than the earth.

The bible is in error

There was no darkness or void before the creation of Earth. 

There was LIGHT!

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Thy rod and staff

Asar (Osiris) The Ancestor deity and progenitor of the Tamerau (Ancient Egyptians)


Psa 23:4 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou [art] with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.

 Excerpted from E. A. Wallis Budge Hieroglyphic Dictionary